What is SD-WAN?

Published on: October 18, 2021

.

25 min read

.

For German Version

There have been substantial advances in wide-area networks over the last several years, none more significant than Software-Defined WAN or SD-WAN, which is altering how network professionals optimize the usage of connections as diverse as MPLS(Multi Protocol Label Switching), frame relay, and DSL. According to a recent Gartner analysis, SD-WAN and vCPE are essential technologies for transforming organizations' networks from "fragile to agile."

Gartner stated:

"We anticipate that new SD-WAN solutions and vCPE platforms will best meet business needs over the next five years because they provide the greatest combination of performance, pricing, and flexibility compared to other hardware-centric alternatives." "Specifically, we anticipate that by 2023, more than 90 percent of WAN (Wide Area Network) edge infrastructure renewal activities will be based on vCPE or SD-WAN appliances as opposed to conventional routers".

SD-WAN's advanced features make it an attractive option for customers, which has attracted a large number of vendors to the market. Gartner reports that more than 60 SD-WAN vendors, including Riverbed, VMware, Cisco, Fortinet, Silver Peak, Aryaka, Nokia, and Versa, compete in the SD-WAN market; many with highly specialized offerings. IDC predicts that SD-WAN technology would increase at a compound annual growth rate of 30.8% between 2018 and 2023, reaching $5.25 billion. According to Adroit Industry Research, the worldwide SD-WAN market is predicted to reach $26 billion by 2028.

In this article, we will discuss what SD-WAN is, what SD-WAN is used for, what problems SD-WAN solves, the basic components, features, and benefits of SD-WAN technology, and best practices of SD-WAN deployment. This article will also cover the distinctions between SD-WAN and other connection technologies, like SDN, MPLS, VPN (Virtual Private Network), and SASE (Secure Access Service Edge).

What Does SD-WAN Stand for?

A Software-defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) is an automated and programmable virtual WAN technology that enables organizations to securely connect users to applications using any mix of transport services, including MPLS, LTE ( Long-Term Evolution), and broadband internet services. SD-WAN expands Software-Defined Networking (SDN) into an application that companies may use to rapidly build a smart hybrid WAN.

SD-WAN is distinguished by its capacity to manage numerous connections, including MPLS, internet, and LTE. The capacity to segment and protect the traffic transiting the WAN is also crucial.

SD-WAN, which consists of business-grade IP VPN, broadband Internet, and wireless services, offers cost-effective application management, especially in the cloud. In SD-WAN implementation, based on network circumstances, application traffic security and Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements, and circuit cost, traffic is automatically and dynamically forwarded through the most suitable and efficient WAN channel. It allows you to configure the routing policy. As a result, SD-WAN offers organizations big advantages like high security, automation, centralized cloud management, better user experience and performance for cloud applications, increased agility, and cost efficiency.

What are the Basic Components of SD-WAN?

The MEF Forum has defined an SD-WAN architecture including an SD-WAN Edge, an SD-WAN Gateway, an SD-WAN Controller, and an SD-WAN Orchestrator.

• SD-WAN Edge: SD-WAN Edge is a physical or virtual network function located at a company's branch/regional/central office location, data center, and in both public and private cloud platforms. The SD-WAN Edge is where the SD-WAN tunnel is launched or ended. It offers SD-WAN service demarcation, similar to how an Ethernet NID provides service demarcation for Carrier Ethernet connectivity. The SD-WAN Edge generates and terminates encrypted tunnels across wired or wireless underlay networks, including T1s/E1s, broadband Internet (DSL, Cable, and PON), WiFi and LTE wireless access networks, and IP (Internet) and MPLS core networks.

  The SD-WAN Edge additionally enforces application-based QoS and security policies, forwards applications across one or more WAN connections, and measures QoS performance over each WAN to decide WAN route selection. In addition to packet buffering/reordering, data deduplication, data compression, and forward error correction, the SD-WAN Edge executes WAN optimization operations. Since SD-WAN Edges often link to public Internet WANs, they would incorporate at least some NAT and firewall functionality.

  The SD-WAN Edge capability is delivered by a CPE device physically located on the customer's premises and controlled by the CSP or MSP. SD-WAN Edge functionality may also be implemented as a software-based virtual network function (VNF) that runs on a virtual CPE (vCPE) at the customer premises or any other type of generalized computing platform, such as a server in a data center, which is managed by the CSP, MSP, or cloud service provider.

• SD-WAN Gateway: The SD-WAN Gateway is a special case of an SD-WAN Edge that enables sites connected via SD-WAN to connect to sites connected via alternative VPN technologies, such as CE or MPLS VPNs. SD-WAN Gateways give access to the SD-WAN service in order to decrease service disruptions and shorten the distance to cloud services or the user.

  A distributed network of gateways may be included in an SD-WAN service by the provider, or it may be configured and managed by the company using the service. By being in the cloud outside of the headquarters, the gateway minimizes headquarters traffic.

  SD-WAN Gateway starts and terminates SD-WAN tunnels similar to an SD-WAN Edge, as well as VPN connections to and from VPN-connected sites. This approach enables sites interconnected via SD-WAN and other VPN technology domains to intercommunicate. This method does not necessitate the installation of SD-WAN Edges at each VPN site in order to achieve connectivity. SD-WAN service capabilities, such as application-based traffic forwarding across multiple WANs or QoS and Security policy management, will not be available at MPLS VPN sites, as they lack SD-WAN Edges that perform these functions.

• SD-WAN Controller: The SD-WAN Controller, which may be in the Orchestrator or an SD-WAN Gateway, is used to determine forwarding choices for application flows. The SD-WAN Controller enables physical or virtual device administration for all related SD-WAN Edges and SD-WAN Gateways. This comprises setup and activation, IP address management, and pushing down rules onto SD-WAN Edges and SD-WAN Gateways. The SD-WAN controller maintains connections to all SD-WAN Edges and SD-WAN Gateways in order to determine the operational status of SD-WAN tunnels across various WANs and obtain QoS performance data for each SD-WAN tunnel. The MSP or CSP manages and maintains the SD-WAN Controller as part of an SD-WAN managed service. In certain SD-WAN systems, the SD-WAN Controller and Service Orchestrator may be combined.

• SD-WAN Orchestrator: SD-WAN Orchestrator is a cloud-hosted or on-premises web-based management solution that enables SD-WAN setup, deployment, and other activities. It streamlines application traffic management by enabling central business policy implementation.

  The Service Orchestrator manages the SD-WAN service lifecycle, including service provisioning, performance, control, assurance, use, analytics, security, and policy. For instance, the Service Orchestrator is responsible for configuring the end-to-end SD-WAN managed service between SD-WAN Edges and SD-WAN Gateways over one or more underlay WANs, such as the Internet and MPLS, and setting up application-based forwarding over WANs based on security, quality of service, or business or intent-based policies. With an SD-WAN managed service, the MSP or CSP runs and maintains the Service Orchestrator.

What are the Features of SD-WAN?

In the SD-WAN market of today, it might be difficult to know what to look for in a solution. Management tools such as centralized controllers and security measures such as a built-in firewall are among the many must-have characteristics. However, judgments based only on features disregard the significance of value and user experience. The must-have features of an SD-WAN solution are explained below:

• Virtualization of the Network: As a network overlay, SD-WAN allows application traffic to be transported independently of the underlying physical or transport layer, hence providing a transport-independent overlay.

  Multiple connections, even those from separate service providers, provide a united pool of resources sometimes referred to as a virtual wide area network (WAN). This functionality allows SD-WAN to deliver applications with high availability and performance. Additionally, it enhances resource consumption and simplifies the network.

  A fundamental advantage of the abstraction principle is that network operators may simply add new connections and applications since there is no static connection between the program and the link it must use. The virtualization also enables self-healing in the event of reduced network performance.

• Providing Secure Overlay: SD-WAN offers a secure overlay independent of the underlying transport components when a secure overlay is enabled. Before participating in the overlay, SD-WAN devices undergo authentication.

  Any combination of circuits and service providers may support safe, encrypted transmission, and the control plane's separation allows automated setup and key management across the many branches. In addition, a network designer may implement segmentation as an independent and uniform overlay over all underlying components.

• Simplifying Service Provision: SD-WAN programmability extends to the installation of network services, whether on branch customer premise equipment (CPE), in the cloud, or in the company and regional data centers.

  The business-level abstraction simplifies both the routing of traffic to the service delivery node and the policy setting. Abstraction at the business level simplifies complicated setups of traffic routing and policy definitions.

• Providing Compatibility: SD-WAN enables progressive resource addition and interoperability with existing devices and circuits. This capacity is directly attributable to the separation and abstraction of the control plane and data plane.

  SD-WAN facilitates the coexistence and interoperability of numerous circuits, devices, and services, a fundamental design objective. APIs allow organizations to integrate current and alternative management and reporting systems.

• Utilizing Cost-Effective Equipment: Utilizing commercially available hardware and network appliances or servers, SD-WAN enhances cost efficiency and adaptability. The separation of the control plane from the data plane allows ordinary hardware to be used for the data plane.

  Remotely supplied virtual appliances may use existing or conventional commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) servers. Typically, however, the initial installation and setup of these servers involve on-site IT installations. This form factor is probably ideal for bigger branches, campuses, and data centers. Virtual appliances are also deployable in hosted cloud environments.

  Custom-designed network appliances based on conventional CPUs, memory, and other components may retain the cost advantages of commercially available silicon while providing the benefits of purpose-built hardware. Custom-designed appliances will have the same configuration out of the box, allowing deployment at sites without IT help. This is a substantial benefit for smaller and more distant branches that lack onsite IT staff.

• Supporting Automation with a framework for business policy: SD-WAN allows the abstraction of configuration into business-level policy definitions that span numerous data plane components and stay stable even as the network evolves. The control plane offers more programming freedom and centralization than a diversified and dispersed data plane. Enterprises may anticipate application awareness and intelligent defaults to offer more abstraction from transport-level specifics. Policy definitions may include references to users and groups, as well as the applications and service levels they should use. Notably, this physical layer abstraction enables the self-provisioning delivery model. Devices no longer need per-device preconfiguration; instead, they inherit settings and rules depending on their assigned network role.

• Monitoring Performance and Use: SD-WAN offers centralized monitoring and visibility across all distant locations and the various physical transportation and service providers. This monitoring tool provides insight at the enterprise level, including application use and network resource consumption. SD-WAN enables comprehensive performance monitoring across all data plane components.

  Combined with business rules, performance monitoring provides intelligent redirection of application traffic over various channels and resources inside a virtual WAN.

• Promoting Interoperability and Openness: Through its open networking, interoperability, and emerging standards, SD-WAN further increases agility, cost efficiency, and gradual migration. Two pioneering groups in SDN and open networking are given below:

  • Open Networking Foundation (ONF): The Open Networking Foundation promotes open, vendor-neutral SDN architecture, interfaces, protocols, and open source software in an effort to accelerate the commercial adoption of SDN.
  • Open Networking User Group (ONUG): The Open Networking User Group (ONUG) is a group of IT business professionals who share ideas and best practices for deploying open networking and SDN designs. ONUG has a Working Group on SD-WAN.

• Facilitating Managed Service: Even the biggest businesses outsource the administration of their branch networks and WAN to managed IT service providers or network service providers. In addition, several cloud application providers, such as Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) providers, create and maintain the circuits required to access their apps.

Why Do You Need SD-WAN?

SD-WANs provide far more operational flexibility and performance assurance than typical hub-and-spoke WANs linked by MPLS lines, making them preferred for managing bandwidth-intensive and internet-bound application traffic. In the era of ubiquitous cloud connection, an SD-WAN is a necessary upgrade over the MPLS WANs of the past, due to the following issues:

• Maintaining Visibility and Control: Traditional wide area networks (WANs) were designed for the pre-cloud era when the majority of application traffic traversed corporate data centers rather than IaaS and SaaS services owned and controlled by external providers. As a result, they offer limited capabilities for evaluating the network's state at any given time and managing any pertinent dangers to network performance and data.

  These deficiencies are arguably most evident on the security front. MPLS WANs lack a firewall and are only secure because traffic is kept off the public internet. Additional point solutions, such as firewalls, must be controlled independently. Inadequate integration and artificial intelligence result in a torrent of signals that can rapidly become impractical, hence raising the risk.

  In the meanwhile, the widespread absence of visibility causes application performance concerns. It is difficult to react within the constraints of a typical WAN, which lacks the required application awareness and real-time intelligence, in situations of severe network congestion, such as when distant workers suddenly increase their use of VoIP and video conferencing.

  Software-defined wide area networks (SD-WANs) centralize network and security administration for extensive visibility and control. They detect and route traffic across WAN networks based on programmable and scalable rules while using numerous integrated security implementations, from the firewall to IDS/IPS platforms, to safeguard application flows without sacrificing performance. SD-WAN is also beginning to be integrated into a wider security access service edge, or SASE, architecture for enhanced security.

• Ensuring Application Performance: MPLS was the finest low-latency method for delivering WAN data for years since MPLS routers could detect the label in a packet's header and transport it via a preset path without doing time-consuming routing table queries. Nonetheless, MPLS networks have become much less efficient and cost-effective as enterprises have experienced digital transformation and as network traffic loads have become significantly greater and more complicated.

  To adequately manage cloud and internet traffic, MPLS-based WANs must generally backhaul it via a headend, such as a data center, in order to apply policies, which is a time-consuming procedure. This backhaul bottleneck drastically reduces employee productivity by reducing the dependability of both virtual and cloud apps.

  The popular remedy of adding dedicated internet access lines to unload some traffic from MPLS onto more bandwidth-rich network transit might be beneficial, but it has its own problems. Bandwidth may be unused despite rising expenses associated with maintaining numerous separate plans and negotiating the time-consuming and costly MPLS provisioning procedure.

  SD-WAN technology combines different kinds of connections under a network overlay, enabling the use of high-bandwidth broadband internet in addition to or instead of MPLS connectivity. In addition to QoS and WAN Op, automated cloud on-ramps may be implemented to improve the SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS experience. In addition, the integrated edge security capabilities of SD-WAN are far less detrimental to the user experience than the MPLS backhaul paradigm, and they provide multilayered threat prevention designed for cloud-connected settings.

• Scalability and Adaptability Issues: Due to the essential dependence on a hardware-defined architecture and security concerns, moves, additions, and modifications are complex in a typical WAN. In addition, carrier-based MPLS setup might take months. Even connecting a single new branch office to the company's WAN may be a huge undertaking. For instance, the location would likely need an array of specialist gear, as well as personnel to design and operate it. These requests are often unreasonable.

  This is due to the fact that all firms have limited technical employees and fixed IT expenditures. Consequently, companies are unable to grow their WANs in response to increasing network and security concerns.

  Zero-touch provisioning in SD-WAN enables enterprises to establish WAN connections at branch offices in minutes, as opposed to days. Creating a future-proof WAN design that can support a broad array of on-premises, online, virtual, cloud, and SaaS applications and desktops requires that these locations have secure internet breakouts. As conditions evolve, SD-WAN regulations may be effortlessly changed.

• Managing Excessive Expenses: MPLS connection is much more costly than similar broadband internet, cellphone, and satellite subscriptions. Not only does it need expensive, custom router hardware, but the available bandwidth for such a high price is insufficient to properly operate real-time apps and busy cloud services.

  Costs manifest in other ways. The complexity of old WAN infrastructure and security architectures, the maintenance of numerous connection plans, and the arduous process of making moves, additions, and modifications at branch offices all result in substantial overhead.

  Additionally, outdated security models increase the likelihood of a data leak. End users who are irritated by the continual backhaul of WAN traffic may turn to insecure shadow IT apps.

  SD-WAN combines different network transport protocols to handle real-time and TCP applications. Although MPLS still plays a function inside an SD-WAN design, the WAN as a whole is no longer constrained by its constraints owing to the advent of other, more cost-effective bandwidth sources. SD-WAN technology combines the bandwidth of all of these forms of connection under a single umbrella.

What are the Benefits of SD-WAN?

The old WAN architecture was restricted to the enterprise, the branch, and the data center. Once a company implements cloud-based services in the form of SaaS and IaaS, its WAN architecture sees a traffic explosion while accessing globally distributed apps.

These changes have several IT ramifications. Performance issues with SaaS applications may limit employee productivity. With poor utilization of dedicated and backup lines, WAN costs might increase. Connecting numerous sorts of users with different types of devices to multiple cloud environments is a daily struggle for IT.

With SD-WAN, IT provides routing, threat prevention, effective offloading of costly circuits, and WAN network administration simplicity. The primary advantages of SD-WAN deployment are as explained below:

• Automation and Orchestration: Despite the progressive rise in demand for cloud-based resources, enterprises must still wait weeks or months to install new WAN circuits or managed service providers (MSPs). Through orchestration and automation, a fully managed cloud-first WAN service provides cloud-based network offers equivalent to other cloud services. This capability would facilitate rapid deployment of new worldwide locations and services, hence enhancing organizational adaptability. It would also make firms more visible and make troubleshooting easier.

• Enhanced Safety: In recent years, businesses and other organizations have used innovative technology to obtain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. However, its adoption has been accompanied by a proportionate number of cybercrimes. Most SD-WAN systems have basic security functionalities, such as a firewall and VPN, that enhance the security of their users. In addition, consumers seeking enhanced SD-WAN security features might seek out solutions that avoid data loss, downtime, and legal liability. Popular SD-WAN solutions have next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), intrusion prevention systems (IPS), encryption, and sandboxing.

• Centralized Management: SD-WAN is often administered through a centralized interface that monitors and controls traffic. Paths to applications are assigned based on their criticality, new sites are provided, software and hardware updates are conducted, and users may adjust bandwidth via a centralized administration interface. Using a centralized management strategy reduces complexity and makes it simpler to monitor apps and their performance from a single location.

• Enhanced Network Adaptability: By prioritizing real-time services such as voice over internet protocol (VoIP) and business-critical traffic, users may configure SD-WAN to route their business traffic via the most efficient path. SD-WAN's adaptability enables customers to alter bandwidth access through any local internet service provider in order to meet real-time demand with speed increases. Additionally, varying bandwidth with deduplication and compression reduces the total cost of ownership (TCO).

  SD-WAN enables the scalability of bandwidth capacity with the direct addition of internet broadband access. Multiple WAN service types, such as direct internet or private multiprotocol label switching (MPLS), are linked together to create a single logical connection. Data de-deduplication, data compression, and secure sockets layer (SSL) are further optimization methods used by SD-WAN to enhance network agility.

• Optimized Cloud Connectivity: Cloud-based services are progressively being used by businesses. SD-WAN allows customers to remotely access the cloud without requiring the main network to manage and protect extra traffic. As workers now work remotely, firms seeking to save office space, equipment, and rent realize cost savings. Additionally, the requirement for extra IT professionals to monitor and safeguard data flow is reduced.

  SD-WAN solutions enhance the performance of cloud apps by focusing on business-critical applications and enabling them to interact directly with the internet. SD-WAN ensures quality and optimizes data before routing network traffic via the most effective paths.

• Decreased Data Complication: As more small firms use technological solutions such as local, edge, and cloud-based applications, network complexity becomes a prevalent issue. Due to competition for limited bandwidth, network performance suffers. It may also entail the employment of additional IT professionals on-site to handle the local IT infrastructure, resulting in higher expenses. SD-WAN offers a solution by monitoring and notifying the performance of various data kinds to guarantee adequate bandwidth allocation. To increase speed, users may configure SD-WAN to prioritize vital traffic over the most efficient route to its destination.

• Decreased Operating Expenses: According to a 2018 poll by IDC Research, up to two-thirds of respondents anticipate savings between 5 and 19%, while a quarter anticipates savings in excess of 39% when implementing SD-WAN technology. SD-WAN technology offers self-managed processes and automation, which helps enterprises to minimize the amount of external IT professionals necessary to do periodic testing and maintenance, resulting in cost savings.

  SD-WAN combines several direct-to-internet (DIA) lines for WAN access, hence decreasing the total cost of bandwidth due to its reduced network infrastructure requirements. In addition, organizations quickly and cheaply establish additional branches online from any place.

• Predictive Analytics: The predictive analytics provided by SD-WAN technology enables IT professionals to manage probable disruptions and minimize other possible concerns. SD-WAN monitors the system in real-time and delivers data analytics to identify and foresee any issues. This capability reduces the time required to resolve IT issues inside a business, hence minimizing the total cost of ownership and ensuring top performance at all times. As a result, firms are more productive and incur fewer expenses, as IT specialists are not always needed on-site. In the event of a problem, they can immediately detect and resolve it.

What are the Drawbacks of SD-WAN?

SD-WAN offers substantial advantages, but it also presents certain obstacles. SD-WAN installations in the cloud, for instance, need virtual appliances in each cloud instance and do not enable mobile users.

SD-WAN poses issues for branch site security. Branches with access to the public Internet are vulnerable to a variety of dangers, and guarding against these risks may incur large expenditures for procuring, sizing, maintaining, and expanding firewalls and UTMs in addition to the SD-WAN. Using separate solutions for security and networking makes troubleshooting more difficult since different network and security consoles must be used.

Another disadvantage of SD WANs is that they are predominantly do-it-yourself endeavors, which means that the planning, design, implementation, and maintenance are the responsibility of your IT department. Consequently, personnel capable of constructing and maintaining this solution are critical. Subsequent to an unforeseen event, engaging external support could entail a significant financial burden.

Furthermore, SD WANs are not entirely impervious to performance degradation. Despite the convenience of connecting to the cloud, one must remain vigilant for the potential occurrences of latency and packet loss. In this particular domain, it is imperative to meticulously evaluate the advantages and disadvantages, particularly if you operate a digital enterprise.

Disadvantages of SD-WAN that warrant consideration are summarized below:

• No on-site security functionality is present. Implementing security standards will continue to be necessary to safeguard your network against external threats and maintain its protection. An enterprise as a whole could be compromised by a single, straightforward data breach.
• SD-WANs are not yet universally implemented. At present, organizations continue to depend on antiquated connections to sustain both internal and external operations. This is remedied through the implementation of the hybrid solution.
• Critical reliance will be placed on IT personnel for the deployment and maintenance of this technological solution. If they are incapable of doing so, seeking external assistance will prove to be a costly endeavor.
• End-to-end QoS cannot be achieved with SD-WAN provisions alone.
• SD-WAN networks are impervious to performance degradation.
• SD-WAN forwarding appliances, as opposed to conventional WAN circuits, provide Ethernet connections for LAN and WAN interoperability. In the event that a time-division multiplexer is required to sustain your network, you will be required to maintain your current wide area network (WAN) router to accommodate your SD architecture.
• SD-WAN vendors exhibit considerable variation and frequently fail to satisfy the initial objectives set forth for software-based networking.

What are the Types of SD-WAN?

There are three fundamental deployment models for SD-WAN:

1. Internet-based SD-WANs
2. Telco or MSP Managed Service SD-WANs
3. SD-WAN as a Service.

The performance requirements of your worldwide users and apps, the expertise of your internal team, and your willingness to construct and manage an SD-WAN will decide the optimal deployment choice for your organization. Three basic SD-WAN deployment types are explained below:

1. Internet-based SD-WAN (Do-it-Yourself, or DIY): Internet-based SD-WANs, also known as Do-It-Yourself (DIY), use equipment at each corporate site, either behind routers or in place of them as the branch link to the enterprise network and the internet (SD-WAN appliances can collapse the typical branch stack by replacing appliances for WAN optimization and firewalls).

Depending on performance considerations and existing regulations, network traffic is routed over old MPLS lines or the internet. Using the internet to supplement MPLS offers a low-cost, flexible, and rapid deployment option and makes it easier to connect users to cloud/SaaS applications. However, the performance of the public internet is often inconsistent, especially over longer distances and in regions where internet reliability is lower. Latency, packet loss, and jitter are intrinsic to the internet, and distance exacerbates these problems.

Internet-based SD-WANs still leave IT with the responsibility of operating the WAN, and you still need to invest in WAN optimization and other technologies for a fully functional network. The benefits of Internet-based SD-WAN are listed below:

• Network and application surveillance
• Rapid deployment and cost savings if internet-only are advantages
• Implements in days
• Great for regional deployments

However, Internet-based SD-WAN has the following drawbacks:

• Probably not supplied as a PoP-centric service, limiting possible SASE integration unless via a third-party security provider
• Absence of cloud/SaaS optimization support
• Not addressing global application performance problems
• The enterprise is responsible for all link contracts and inherits the drawbacks of both the Internet (performance) and MPLS (cost, inflexibility, deployment timeframes)
• Zero CapEx

2. Telco or MSP Managed SD-WAN Service: A managed SD-WAN service is one in which the client pays a service provider to install and supply connection, as well as any necessary equipment. The managed SD-WAN is a value-added service that comes with service level agreements (SLAs), but the managed service is typically deployed using the same hardware as internet-based SD-WANs and will typically rely on the public internet for access to cloud/SaaS applications, so the same caveats apply: application performance and user experience will suffer over greater distances. In addition, the telco or MSP providing the managed service will depend on hardware and software from one or more networking and security suppliers, resulting in support handoffs that provide a subpar user experience. Benefits of MSP or Telco SD-WAN are listed below:
   • Dependable performance and constant latency within area
   • Completely managed service with assistance
   • Direct IaaS/PaaS/SaaS connection

But, MSP or Telco SD-WAN has the following disadvantages:

• Customer may be required to pay for extra features.
• SD-WAN is installed as an overlay, which may result in a less visible underlay (transport network) and negatively affect SLAs.
• For out-of-region connections, a provider may need to form partnerships.
• Could not be supplied as a PoP-centric service, hence limiting its potential SASE amalgamation
• Not necessarily involve WAN optimization
• Possible lack of access to some cloud/SaaS services

3. SD-WAN Management as a Service: With SD-WAN as a Service, also known as a Cloud-First WAN, businesses purchase SD-WAN utilizing a consumption-based approach, similar to how they acquire cloud services today.

Businesses can depend on a fast and secure private core network without having to build out a cumbersome infrastructure and maintain extra hardware at the edge, making it easy to develop branch offices or transfer locations without sacrificing application speed, security, or reliability.

Enabling this quicker connection through a global private network coupled with WAN optimization means that every employee in the globe has smooth access and receives consistent performance while accessing mission-critical apps from any location in the world. Benefits of SD-WAN Management as a Service are listed below:

• Zero CapEx and Lower Total Cost of Ownership
• Reliable functionality and constant latency
• Private Network Interconnect
• Compatible with every application: on-premises, SaaS, and the cloud
• Network and application surveillance
• Integral WAN optimization
• Deployment in hours or days including Last Mile Services
• Direct IaaS/PaaS/SaaS connectivity

However SD-WAN Management as a Service is not suited for IT organizations that want to build their own network infrastructure and presented by just a few of vendors.

What are the SD-WAN Use Cases?

Typically, SD-WAN technology generates a transport-agnostic virtual overlay. This is accomplished via the abstraction of underlying public or private WAN connections, such as Internet broadband, fiber, long-term evolution (LTE), or multiprotocol label switching (MPLS). An SD-WAN overlay allows businesses to continue utilizing their current WAN connections. SD-WAN technology centralizes network control, hence decreasing costs and offering real-time management of application traffic across existing lines.

The most prevalent SD-WAN use cases may be categorized as follows:

• Geographic Expansion: When a firm extends into a new geographical area or conducts a merger or acquisition, it may use SD-WAN to manage new and old sites with a single unified policy and control interface.

• WAN Resiliency: Increasing WAN resilience by establishing a hybrid network architecture with several active/active network connections to the same location. Normally, traffic can be balanced between several services; however, if one connection is lost, traffic might fail over to another service.

• Cloud Migration: By transferring several apps to the cloud, cloud migration enables digital transformation. SD-WAN enables application-based routing, allowing any application deployed in the cloud or on-premises to use the wide-area service that best meets its requirements. SD-WAN facilitates cloud migration by offering direct access to major IaaS providers, SaaS application acceleration, and multi-cloud connectivity.

• Secure Internet Access: SD-WAN allows remote users to have safe access to SaaS, IaaS, and the internet while working from any location. It decreases configuration and operating complexity.

• Hybrid Workplace: SD-WAN enhances application performance and enables direct cloud access to facilitate hybrid and multi-cloud projects. Flexible network security secures people, devices, and applications regardless of the location from which they connect, whether on-site or at home.

• MPLS to SD-WAN Transition: SD-WAN facilitates a smooth transition from MPLS to SD-WAN. SD-WAN coexists with MPLS or totally replaces it with a high-quality, fully meshed Layer 2 transport core that provides equivalent QoS at a lower cost and with fewer complications.

• UCaaS Performance: SD-WAN improves the performance of Unified communications as a service (UCaaS) by identifying and marking UCaaS traffic, directing it intelligently and dynamically across internet access connections and via the core infrastructure while reducing packet loss and latency to give an optimum user experience.

• Application Performance: SD-WAN improves application performance by offering direct access to SaaS providers. To limit the impact of latency on application performance, the system consists of a private core network with many points of presence throughout the globe.

What are the Best Practices for SD-WAN Adoption?

This section provides a ten-point checklist of best practices and critical requirements for business IT departments contemplating the migration to SD-WAN architecture. This best practice gives the impetus to get the process started, as many organizations battle with the difficulties of conventional WAN and question how to begin the shift. There are no shortcuts for transitioning from a standard WAN to an SD-WAN. The best practices of SD-WAN deployment are explained below:

• Secure and Optimized Access to SaaS and Enterprise Applications: To prevent backhauling fees and simplify settings, SD-WAN should offer policy-driven direct access to SaaS and cloud data centers. Even when directly contacting cloud destinations, a data plane node in the cloud may allow optimizations such as dynamic route shaping and the insertion of additional services.

• Transport Independent Design: Transport-independent architecture facilitates private, hybrid, and Internet-only alternatives. As a network overlay, SD-WAN allows application traffic to be transported independently of the underlying physical or transport layer, hence providing a transport-independent overlay.

• Flexible Deployment Options: A CPE, a controller, and an orchestrator may be deployed in either a physical or virtual form. A cloud-hosted option facilitates the implementation of services and optimizes access to SaaS applications. In addition, multitenancy should provide security by separating the control and data planes, allowing service providers to offer SD-WAN as a service to end users.

• Installation, Configuration, Operations, and Management (ICOM) Simplicity: SD-WAN reduces box-by-box setups and enables zero-touch branch site installations. SD-WAN enables centralized monitoring and visibility across all distant locations, apps, users, and hosts, as well as a range of physical transports and service providers. This monitoring tool provides insight at the enterprise level, including application use and network resource consumption.

• Robust, Scalable, and Redundant Control and Data Plane: Multiple connections, even those from separate service providers, provide a united pool of resources sometimes referred to as a virtual wide area network (WAN). The SD-WAN overlay layer should offer a highly available architecture that is extended with cloud-hosted choices deployed across many data centers.

• Considerations for SD-WAN: The SD-WAN system must intelligently reroute application flows around network issues depending on real connection circumstances, including performance and capacity. More sophisticated implementations enable per-packet steering on a subsecond timescale that can relocate specific application flows without degradation in the middle of a session. When steering alone cannot prevent network difficulties, additional mitigation measures enhance performance, particularly over broadband/Internet.

• Programmability: The programmability and ability to interoperate with other solution providers through APIs allow integration into diverse current management and reporting systems employed by organizations and aid enterprises in integrating an SD-WAN solution.

• Protected and Encrypted Layer: SD-WAN offers a secure, encrypted overlay that is independent of the underlying transport components. An SD-WAN system should divide sensitive traffic across the local area network (LAN) and wide area network (WAN). By providing cloud-based security and optimization for SaaS apps, SD-WAN circumvent costly backhaul.

• Network Service Implementation: You may limit branch sprawl by incorporating network services into branch customer premise equipment (CPE), the cloud, or regional and corporate data centers. Abstraction at the business level simplifies complicated setups of traffic routing and policy definitions.

• Migration and Interoperability: Consider a system that allows for the progressive addition of sites and functions to a site and is compatible with current devices and circuits. Both technological architectures and commercial strategies facilitate SD-WAN gradual migration.

• Purpose-Built SD-WAN Solution: As the need for SD-WAN increases, existing providers with branch network solutions such as WAN optimization and multilink bonding will add an SD-WAN solution to their portfolios. Based on these top 10 concerns, our advice is to seek out a purpose-built SD-WAN solution.

• Communication with Stakeholders on the Deployment Process: Educate stakeholders on the deployment process and clarify that SD-WAN is an addition to existing network infrastructure prior to initiating an SD-WAN project. Executives should not consider SD-WAN as a straightforward substitute for conventional network technologies. Clarify that you must retain the current technology and integrate it with future SD-WAN investments. A deeper comprehension of the technical context and deployment methodologies will increase your leadership support.

• Selective Public Internet: SD-WAN may use public Internet connections for all middle-mile communications. While this can be a very cost-effective option, it is not recommended. There is no way to determine which connections traffic will traverse, creating worries about security and performance. SD-WAN traffic should be sent through private networks wherever feasible, particularly for sensitive or mission-critical communications. Some SD-WAN service providers allow customers to use their own secure worldwide network. Reserve Internet bandwidth for non-critical and non-sensitive applications, as well as failover situations when the private network is offline.

• SD-WAN Service Test: SD-WAN solutions may enable automation and zero-touch setup, but you must ensure it functions as intended. Testing is sometimes neglected, although it is a vital component of an SD-WAN project. Test thoroughly before, during, and after implementation. A typical SD-WAN project requires testing for three to six months, with an emphasis on quality of service (QoS), scalability, availability and failover, and management tool dependability.

• Security for SD-WAN and SASE: SD-WAN employs a distributed network fabric, which generally lacks the security and access controls required to safeguard business networks in the cloud. Gartner developed a new network security paradigm, secure access service edge, to solve this issue (SASE). SASE combines WAN capabilities with security measures including:

  • Firewall as a Service (FWaaS)
  • Secure web gateway
  • Cloud access security broker (CASB)
  • Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

The combination of these cloud-native security features makes it feasible to assure the security of SD-WAN networks. SASE systems enable secure connection and consistent security for mobile users and branch offices. They provide a centralized view of the entire network, enabling administrators and security teams to identify users, devices, and endpoints across a globally distributed SD-WAN, enforce access and security policies, and provide consistent security capabilities across multiple geographical locations and multiple cloud platforms.

What are the Differences Between SD-WAN and SASE?

SASE and SD-WAN are often compared despite their differences since they have certain commonalities. Specifically, both SASE and SD-WAN are virtualized technologies that span expansive geographic regions. SASE and SD-WAN both aim to link geographically dispersed branch offices or end users to an organization's network resources in a scalable and manageable manner.

In addition, a number of specialists assert that SASE is an evolution of SD-WAN since it combines SD-WAN features with better network security services, such as cloud access security brokers(CASB) and zero-trust network access(ZTNA). SASE combines the advantages of SD-WAN with third-party security services on a single platform.

SASE focuses on endpoints and end-user devices, while SD-WAN is primarily concerned with linking a company's branch offices to its data center. Unlike SD-WAN, SASE performs traffic inspection at numerous global points of presence (PoPs) rather than backhauling traffic to the data center. SASE features include usability, security, and IT administration simplification. The primary distinctions between SASE and SD-WAN are as follows:

• Implementation and design: How firms install SASE vs SD-WAN is a fundamental distinction between the two. Depending on their IT requirements, organizations may install SD-WAN through physical, software, or cloud connections, however according to Gartner's definition, SASE is cloud-only. For SD-WAN, businesses install the SD-WAN device or software client at each branch site, enabling connection to the organization's data resources. Organizations may choose for managed, do-it-yourself, or hybrid SD-WAN. Control is outsourced to a service provider using managed SD-WAN. IT teams implement and maintain SD-WAN services on their own for DIY SD-WAN. There is also a hybrid approach in which the company and vendor share responsibilities.

  SASE systems integrate network and security capabilities into a single as-a-service application. These cloud capabilities may increase the adaptability of SASE for enterprises. SASE client software are used by enterprises for mobile users, remote employees, apps, data centers, and more.

  SASE and SD-WAN topologies vary based on deployment variations. SASE is more dispersed and cloud-based, while SD-WAN uses physical equipment, software, and cloud-based vendor services to form an overlay network. SD-WAN also adheres to the conventional networking tenet that all network infrastructure should revolve around a company's data center, while SASE views the data center to be just another service edge or SE.

• Security: SD-WAN was not designed with security in mind, but SASE has security built in. When viewing SASE as an evolution of SD-WAN technology, it is clear that SASE incorporates many of the SD-WAN's features such as scalability and enhanced administration, into a more secure, cloud-based platform.

  SD-WAN has some security features, but many SD-WAN manufacturers collaborate with security vendors to offer more complete, integrated security services alongside their SD-WAN products. This may increase the cost of SD-WAN for businesses, as they must adopt and pay extra for a separate service to provide the required level of security.

• Traffic and Connection: Due to their distinct designs, SASE and SD-WAN manage traffic differently. SD-WAN is mainly concerned with connecting branch offices to a company's network and data center resources, using network rules to decide how to route traffic between endpoints and backhaul traffic via the data center.

  In contrast, SASE focuses on cloud environments and endpoint connectivity at the service edge. As SASE is hosted in the cloud, it is not required to backhaul traffic via data centers. Instead, SASE transmits traffic through globally dispersed PoPs. The PoP inspects and forwards communications to its destination across the internet or SASE architecture.

• Remote Access: Remote access is becoming a need for every business and corporate IT service. Although Gartner established the acronym SASE in late 2019, SASE is maturing in a world impacted by the COVID-19 epidemic and the subsequent remote work boom. Consequently, the built-in remote access capabilities of SASE are an essential component of the service.

  SD-WAN lacks native remote access capabilities, thus enterprises must invest in third-party services to enhance SD-remote WAN's access. SD-WAN is thus the more costly option for remote access. Due to the expense, if an enterprise employs SD-WAN to link distant workers, it may only provide SD-WAN at home to a subset of its workforce.

• Required Knowledge: SD-WAN is a development of standard WAN technology, hence networking skills are necessary for its implementation. SD-WAN implementation and administration are handled by traditional, compartmentalized network teams.

  However, SASE involves networking, security, and cloud technologies, necessitating a larger skill set. SASE is less compartmentalized than SD-WAN and may need network, security, and cloud teams to collaborate.

In conclusion, traditional SD-WAN is not flawless. Many SD-WANs lack integrated security, necessitating the deployment of independent security technologies at each branch site. SD-WAN also requires the installation of SD-WAN equipment at each endpoint, making its usage for cloud and mobile traffic difficult or impossible. Lastly, SD-WAN often depends on the public Internet, which might raise issues about its dependability. Secure access service edge (SASE) technologies, however, overcome a number of these issues.

What are the Differences between SD-WAN and SDN?

SD-WAN is comparable to SDN for the WAN. Possibly the most prevalent and well-used use case in SDN. The SDN concept gained traction for abstracting network infrastructure in the data center and other corporate perimeter areas. SD-WAN served a similar function but had to abstract infrastructure aspects that varied in terms of connection kinds, service providers, and geographic locations. Given that it traversed the enterprise's perimeter, it required a solid security component.

SD-WAN is used to link geographically dispersed locations, sites, and remote users, while SDN is used to manage Local Area Networks (LAN) and carrier core networks.

SDN allows on-demand services, reduces high operating costs, and improves network performance since it is predominantly utilized in conventional data centers. SD-WAN differentiates from typical Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) networks by delivering scalable and secure connections anywhere in the globe at a lower cost. SD-WAN accomplishes essentially the same duties as SDN, except for the Wide Area Network (WAN).

SDN and SD-WAN both serve the same goal and are built on the same architecture of separating the control and data forwarding planes. Both SDN and SD-WAN may be virtualized to include additional Virtual Network Functions (VNF), such as firewall and unified threat management capabilities, in addition to WAN optimization. The following is a comparison of the SD-WAN and SDN technologies:

SDN	SD-WAN
Used for internal data centers and service provider infrastructure	Utilized for branch locations, distant users, and data centers.
Configured by a user or administrator	Managed and configured by the vendor
Provides high bandwidth on demand	Secures access and intelligently prioritizes traffic
Offers a centralized console for control and orchestration	Offers a single console for orchestration, control, and touchless provisioning
Supports fundamental network infrastructure	Supports current Virtual Private Networks (VPN)
Utilizes both standard and customized switching hardware	Utilizes commercially available x86 equipment - physical, virtual, and cloud
Reduces operational expenditures (OpEx)	Reduces both Operational and Capital expenditures (OpEx & CapEx) costs
Table 1. SD-WAN vs SDN

What are the Differences between SD-WAN and WAN?

The primary difference between SD-WAN and WAN technologies is they have distinct purposes. SD-WAN enables distant locations to connect to networks, data centers, and/or multiple-clouds with reduced latency, improved performance, and more dependable connection. On the other hand, the typical role of the WAN was to link branch or campus users to applications housed on servers in the data center.

SD-WAN, unlike standard WAN, is software-defined and offers various benefits. Initially, it permits the removal of expensive MPLS circuits. SD-WAN also employs local internet offloading and aids in bringing user traffic closer to the cloud. It supports high-bandwidth heavy applications, which may be a difficulty for standard WAN infrastructures, and offers real-time monitoring of traffic.

Examine the primary distinctions between traditional WAN and SD-WAN systems are given in the next table.

WAN	SD-WAN
Configuration updates need time-consuming, error-prone human configuration effort.	Automated, real-time configuration adjustments that avoid human mistake
Available load balancing and catastrophe recovery may be difficult to implement.	Integrated load balancing and catastrophe recovery with rapid or touchless deployment
Requires individual configuration of edge devices and does not permit policy application en masse.	Utilizes virtual overlays - can immediately duplicate policies across a large number of edge devices
Restricted to a single connection choice - old MPLS lines	Can use several connection choices optimally, including MPLS and SDN-managed broadband lines
Relies on VPNs, which function well with a single IP backbone but cannot coexist with high throughput tasks such as audio and video.	Capable of directing traffic for various sorts of applications, preserving bandwidth for those who use it most.
Needs manual tuning	Automatically detects network conditions and may dynamically optimize the WAN.
Table 2. WAN vs SD-WAN

What are the Differences Between SD-WAN and MPLS?

Both SD-WAN and MPLS provide data centers and branch offices with network performance, quality, and availability. SD-WAN often maintains MPLS connections alongside other kinds like broadband and long-term evolution (LTE) and routes traffic over the optimal available channel in real-time. Both methods provide dependable, secure, and private connections, but their flexibility, pricing, and capabilities vary considerably.

There are some key distinctions between SD-WAN and MPLS. SD-WAN is distinguished from MPLS primarily by its virtualized architecture, while MPLS is hardware-based. SD-WAN is sometimes seen as the software abstraction of MPLS technology, which provides branch locations and distant users with a secure, private connection.

For the comprehension of the distinctions between SD-WAN and MPLS, we'll explore three crucial factors: cost, security, and performance. Some of these benefits are less clear-cut than others, and there may even be some negatives in very certain circumstances, as will be detailed in further detail below.

• SD-WAN is more cost-effective than MPLS: In the past, many businesses linked outlying branches and retail sites to the central data center through a hub-and-spoke WAN strategy that used individual MPLS connections. In order to process and redistribute all data, processes, and transactions, including access to cloud-based services or the internet, traffic had to be backhauled to the data center. Compared to an SD-WAN system, MPLS is prohibitively expensive.

  SD-WAN decreases cost by delivering optimal, multi-point connection utilizing dispersed, private data traffic exchange and control points to allow customers safe, local access to the network or cloud-based services they need, while securing direct access to cloud and internet resources.

• Secure SD-WAN Provides Greater Security than MPLS: MPLS offers a protected and monitored connectivity between branch offices and the data center through the service provider's internal backbone, which seems to be a security benefit. Public internet connections do not give this degree of safety by default.

  However, this comparison is misleading. MPLS does not give any kind of data analysis for the information it transmits. This duty remains with the MPLS client. Even while crossing an MPLS connection, malware and other vulnerabilities must be examined, necessitating the deployment of a network firewall and any extra security functions at one end of the connection or the other.

  To be fair, though, many SD-WAN options have the same problem. Aside from some basic security features, the majority of SD-WAN systems still need the addition of an overlay security solution. And for firms that attempt to add security to their complicated SD-WAN connections as an afterthought, the difficulty is often more than anticipated.

• SD-WAN Offers Superior Performance to MPLS: From a performance standpoint, MPLS offers a consistent, constant amount of bandwidth. While this may seem to be a benefit, modern traffic has very variable performance needs. As a result, organizations must lease an MPLS connection for their worst-case traffic load scenario, which means that much of the time, expensive bandwidth is unused, and at other times, the MPLS connection may impede network connectivity due to the continuously increasing volume of data generated by modern networks and devices.

  Certainly, certain MPLS connections provide a sliding scale of connectivity, but even then it is restricted by its inability to recognize the type of traffic it is carrying and make dynamic modifications in response.

  While all traffic requires bandwidth to work, some applications, such as audio and video, have latency requirements that must be regularly checked. When many applications use the same connection tunnel, latency-sensitive traffic must be prioritized. This requires application identification, traffic shaping, load balancing, and connection priority, which MPLS cannot deliver.

  SD-WAN may change bandwidth and other services in accordance with the applications that it identifies. It can initiate multiple parallel connections and then provide granular load balancing between them, as well as failover to a new connection if available bandwidth drops, as well as rate-limitless sensitive applications to ensure that latency-sensitive applications receive all the space and horsepower they require.

  There are, nevertheless, a few instances in which MPLS may be preferable to SD-WAN alone. For instance, MPLS offers a clean and secure connection that is particularly desired for specific kinds of data, applications, and transactions, particularly when a high level of confidentiality and integrity is needed. MPLS is a viable alternative for every SD-WAN system, thus this is not an either/or scenario. Critical transactions may continue to be conducted over MPLS.

  In certain areas, particularly the United States, MPLS may be rather costly. Therefore, replacing MPLS with a public Internet connection might be relatively cost-effective in certain places. SD-WAN may be deployed over an MPLS connection to offer more protection and capability than an MPLS solution alone, even in situations where MPLS is much less costly or where concerns about security or dependability are more relevant than cost differences. SD-WAN offers increased flexibility, granular traffic management, integrated security, and the ability to exploit numerous connection strategies - MPLS, public internet, IPSec, SSL, etc.- using a single SD-WAN implementation.

The following is a comparison of the SD-WAN and MPLS technologies:

MPLS	SD-WAN
Since it is a connection-oriented technology, MPLS mandates a hub-and-spoke network topology that is incompatible with cloud usage	It can use connectionless transport technologies and traffic may be sent anywhere without the need for backhaul.
Exclusive business network with costly bandwidth and stringent SLAs	Multiple transport options are available, including DIA, 5G, and MPLS.
Different enterprises's traffic is separated but not encrypted	Fully encrypted tunnels from/to any enterprise site
High bandwidth expense and inefficient cloud resource routing	Reduced expenses because policy-based routing leverages cheaper transit for some applications.
No built-in elasticity in bandwidth utilization	Internet traffic may be separated into peaks
CLI-based network operation	Focus on automation and orchestration
CLI-based network operation may make MPLS expensive and time-consuming to implement. Due to provisioning periods, MPLS-based networks cannot keep up with the agility of digital business models.	Idealistically, SD-WAN is built on automation and orchestration, however, this is not always the case. Numerous conventional SD-WAN implementations perpetuate the CLI paradigm with their extensive policy definitions
The hub-and-spoke architecture of MPLS often imposes a box-centric security strategy that is incapable of adequately securing cloud applications or supporting the development of hybrid workforce models.	Ideally, SASE would implement a cloud-centric, zero-trust security approach. This is not true for all SASE vendor models, though. And the cornerstone for a successful SASE implementation remains a reliable SD-WAN solution with the capacity to meet enterprise-SLAs.
Packet routing limits visibility	Broad application visibility
Table 3. MPLS vs SD-WAN

What are the Differences between SD-WAN and VPN?

SD-WAN and VPNs are uniquely built to accomplish the same objective. Both provide an encrypted network connection with the possibility to add further security features. While many perceive SD-WAN to be a newer technology intended to replace VPN, several additional aspects play a significant part in the SD-WAN versus VPN debate. The most significant distinctions between the two SD-WAN and VPN are explained below.

Firstly, SD-WAN solutions serve as gateways to a network of fully-connected SD-WAN equipment. But VPNs enable point-to-point communication.

Secondly, while VPNs route all traffic via a single network connection, SD-WANs route traffic over a variety of transport mediums.

Lastly, SD-WAN is considerably superior to VPN for businesses that demand scalability, high performance, dependability, and agility.

What are th Top SD-WAN Vendors?

The most popular SD-WAN Vendors are listed below:

1. Palo Alto Networks
2. VMware
3. Versa Networks
4. Fortinet
5. Cisco
6. Barracuda
7. Cradlepoint
8. Citrix
9. Peplink
10. Forcepoint
11. Huawei
12. HPE (Aruba)
13. Nuage Networks
14. Juniper Networks

History of SD-WAN

Earlier networking technologies such as point-to-point (PPP) leased lines, frame relay, and MPLS gave way to modern SD networking and SD-WAN technology. Before frame relay eliminated the need to purchase and maintain separate connecting lines across different corporate sites, PPP was the initial method for linking numerous local area networks (LANs). Using Internet Protocol (IP)-based technology, the MPLS connection brought previously independent services such as phone, video, and data networking into the same network.

MPLS quickly surpassed frame relay in terms of popularity due to its use of Internet Protocol (IP)-based technology to integrate previously independent services such as phone, video, and data networking into a single network. The decreased latency and quality of service (QoS) advantages that MPLS offers are still the primary reasons why it is the predominant business WAN technology today.

SD-WAN was created in the 2010s, notably in 2013, and as more technicians analyzed SD-WAN for its benefits, they came to find that SD-WAN offers many of the same advantages over MPLS as MPLS did over frame relay. SD networks offer MPLS-level QoS while being substantially less costly and significantly simpler to expand, to put it simply.

SD-WAN manages a range of connections and dynamically routes traffic over the best available transport; it offers both redundancy and much greater capacity through lower-cost lines. SD-WAN solutions are much less expensive than MPLS when installation and delivery times are factored in. The finest SD-WAN systems include zero-touch provisioning, enabling sites to be brought up rapidly without the need for networking or security specialists to be on-site during installation.