Skip to main content

SASE vs SSE: Differences, Security, Capabilities and Components

Published on:
.
11 min read

SASE, or Secure Access Service Edge, is a unified cloud-based framework that combines networking and security functions. It aims to deliver secure and optimized access to applications and services for distributed users. It integrates Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) and security services like Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) into a single platform.

SSE, or Security Service Edge, is a subset of SASE that focuses exclusively on security services. It delivers critical security functions such as threat protection and access control without the networking capabilities provided by SD-WAN. SSE primarily includes CASB, FWaaS, Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and ZTNA.

Software-defined networking (SDN), with a focus on facilitated networking for branch offices and remote sites over a cloud fabric, is one of the main components of SASE. SSE is more focused on end users than SASE. Meanwhile, SSE covers some aspects of network access and mediated connectivity. SASE offers a broader approach to securing and optimizing network connectivity, while SSE provides a specialized security solution for cloud environments. The choice between SASE and SSE depends on an organization's specific security and networking requirements.

In this article, differences, security, capabilities, and components of SASE vs SSE, and the following topics are going to be covered:

  • What is SSE?

  • How does SSE Work?

  • What are the security service edge components?

  • What are SSE Capabilities?

  • How is SSE in Terms of Security?

  • What is the Difference Between SSE and SASE?

  • What are SSE Applications?

  • Is SSE the same as SASE?

  • How can SASE work with SSE?

  • What are Advantages of SASE over SSE?

  • What are Disadvantages of SASE over SSE?

    • How is SASE Implemented?

    • Is SASE an Emerging technology?

What is SSE?

Security Service Edge (SSE) is a cybersecurity framework introduced by Gartner in 2021. Its focus is securing access to web applications, cloud services, and private applications. SSE serves as the security component of the broader Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) model, which integrates networking and security functionalities into a single cloud-based solution. Access to private apps, cloud services, and internet protection is the main goal of Security Service Edges (SSE). The features comprise threat prevention, data security, access control, security monitoring, and acceptable-use control. It is enforced through network- and API-based integration. SSE can have agent-based or on-premises components, however, it is typically provided as a cloud-based service. SSE provides a consolidated approach to delivering the following security functions:

  • Access control by ensuring only authorized users and devices can access resources.

  • Threat protection by safeguarding against cyber threats like malware, ransomware, and phishing attacks.

  • Data security by protecting sensitive information through encryption and other measures.

  • Security monitoring with continuously tracking network activity and identifying potential threats.

  • Acceptable use control by enforcing policies and preventing unauthorized activities.

How does SSE Work?

Security Service Edge (SSE) is a cloud-based security framework designed to secure and manage access to web applications, cloud services, and the Internet. SSE solutions ensure secure remote access to cloud services, private apps, and the internet. Businesses are now able to do better security inspections closer to endpoints with cloud-delivered Security Service Edge solutions. Regardless of where users connect, it establishes a dynamic security perimeter that offers threat prevention, data security, security monitoring, and access control. Businesses used to host their apps centrally in data centers, which allowed for a range of security checks, including firewalls and IDS/IPS. Enterprises increasingly find it difficult to defend their apps against external attacks as they operate in distributed environments outside of the conventional security perimeter due to the migration of cloud-based apps and initiatives for remote work. Legacy network infrastructures make it impossible for IT personnel to keep an eye on every user contact with SaaS apps. Furthermore, application performance and user experience suffer significantly when traffic intended for the cloud is diverted to the data center for security inspection. SSE works by providing a suite of security services delivered through the cloud. These services include components like Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and Zero Trust Network Access.

SWG enforces security policies for web access. It prevents access to malicious websites, filters content, and controls the use of web applications. When a user tries to access a web application, the SWG examines the request and applies security policies. It is allowed if the request is deemed safe; if not, it is blocked or flagged.

CASB provides visibility and control over the use of cloud services. This ensures compliance with security policies. In its role as an intermediary, CASB stands between consumers and cloud apps. It keeps an eye on activity, recognizes unusual behaviors, and implements security measures like encryption and data loss prevention.

ZTNA uses the zero trust principle, which holds that no user or device is trusted by default, to protect remote access to applications. Before allowing access to applications, ZTNA checks the security posture of devices and the identities of users. Permission to access is based on need-to-know, and security is maintained through constant monitoring.

A crucial part of the larger Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) design is SSE. Securing access to the internet, web apps and cloud services is the primary goal of SSE. Security rules, eliminating data breaches, and guaranteeing compliance help it accomplish this aim. SSE is made to keep users safe on any device or in any location. It makes safe digital transformation smoother. SSE is primarily focused on security services delivered through the cloud. It addresses the security needs of organizations by providing tools like SWG, CASB, and ZTNA. The goal is to protect data and users as they access cloud applications and the web. SASE is a broader framework that combines both networking and security functions. SASE combines security and networking features into a single, cloud-delivered solution. It integrates SSE's security services with Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (SD-WAN) and other network optimization technologies. The primary goal of SASE is to simplify the management of network and security functions in a distributed enterprise environment.

What are the Security Service Edge (SSE) components?

Security Service Edge components are as follows

  • Secure Web Gateway (SWG): SWG filters and inspects web traffic to protect against malicious websites, malware, and data loss. They are applicable to cloud assets, office resources, and remote desktops. Access control and identity security policies are integrated by the SWG. Additionally, it stops illegal access requests at the source. Web visibility and URL filtering are used by policy enforcement to prevent harmful content. Access controls governors who can access social media networks or websites that contain offensive content. SWGs likewise monitor data transfers across the web boundary. This guarantees that private information stays within network boundaries.

  • Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): CASB ensures data security and compliance for cloud applications by monitoring and controlling access to cloud services. Cloud Access Security Brokers identify SaaS apps. A unified dashboard can then be used by security teams to manage these apps. CASBs enable real-time data location for all SaaS applications. This strengthens the protection of data. They might have capabilities for behavior analytics and user entities. Even deeper degrees of traffic monitoring are made possible by these techniques.

  • Firewall as a Service (FWaaS): FWaaS provides stateful firewall protection to secure network traffic between users, applications, and data centers. It differs from conventional firewalls in that it offers location-independent, instantly responsive security that is adaptive to threats. This adaptability is crucial in a setting where users must have access from multiple locations. The Zero Trust concept, which guarantees connection verification and improves security for on-premises and cloud environments alike, is upheld by FWaaS. It creates a comprehensive and effective security system when combined with other SSE components like CASB and SWG.

  • Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): ZTNA implements a strict zero-trust security model. It grants access based on continuous verification of user identity, device health, and application requirements. ZTNA configurations use identity-based access control and context to protect cloud and on-premises assets. These restrictions allow privileged users to access resources that are necessary but prevent unauthorized users from doing so. Zero Trust establishes a dynamic network border within the framework of SSE. Systems identify every user and every linked device. SSE Software keeps an eye on access requests and uniformly implements security rules across all endpoints. Without valid authentication, no traffic flows over the network or related cloud services.

What are SSE Capabilities?

Security Service Edge (SSE) represents a modern approach to cybersecurity, focusing on a suite of integrated, cloud-centric security capabilities designed to protect users and data in a distributed environment. Fundamentally, SSE offers safe access to SaaS apps, the internet, and particular internal apps. However, not every SSE provider is made equal. Among the key components of SSE are access control, threat prevention, data security, security monitoring, and appropriate usage control. Some details about these capabilities of SSE are outlined below:

  • Access Control: SSE employs Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), which operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify." This approach ensures that users are granted access to applications and data based solely on their identity and the context of their access request. ZTNA restricts access to only those resources that users need.

  • Threat Protection: To defend against online threats, SSE combines a number of techniques. Secure Web Gateways (SWGs) are employed to filter online traffic in order to prevent dangerous content and enforce security regulations. SWGs serve as an intermediary between clients and the web. It reduces risks while reaching resources.

  • Data Security: Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) keep an eye on and regulate data transfers between internal networks and cloud services. This is another aspect to strengthen data security within SSE. CASBs assist businesses in keeping an eye on their data, enforcing compliance guidelines, and safeguarding private data from theft or illegal access.

  • Security Monitoring: SSE solutions provide continuous security monitoring capabilities. Businesses are able to monitor customer behavior and network activities in real-time. In order to spot any security incidents and stop threats before they get worse, monitoring is essential. SSE can identify anomalies that can point to fraudulent activity or data breaches by examining user behavior.

  • Acceptable Use Control: SSE has systems in place to enforce regulations governing acceptable usage. This sets limits on how users are permitted to utilize company resources. This feature is crucial for upholding compliance and making sure staff members follow company policies on data handling and internet usage.

How is SSE in Terms of Security?

SSE enhances visibility into data and remote users, irrespective of the location, connection, or channels used. Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, SSE updates software patches instantly across all apps without the usual wait time associated with human IT administration. Additionally, user behavior is viewable regardless of connection, location, or activity because security is now provided through the cloud. Security teams would benefit from this as they handle unusual traffic on their networks, which frequently indicates malicious activities. Even as the demand to safeguard remote users and assets grows, putting more strain on security and operations teams, SSE offers enterprises extra agility, scalability, and operational improvements. All sizes of enterprises will see an increase in deployments as a result of these benefits and trends.

When it comes to SASE, in essence, it adds more network segmentation and operational features, like quality of services (QoS), by integrating SD-WAN capabilities into SSE. Although SASE suppliers provide more features, replicating network connections may require additional setup, network equipment, and migration time. In order to safeguard remote users and assets, classic VPNs route all traffic through the local network and employ standard network security controls. However, these VPNs frequently experience scalability concerns as well as issues with network and internet connection bandwidth. Enterprise VPN does not have the complete SSE or SASE capabilities to secure cloud infrastructure and remote applications, but it does address issues with scalability and bandwidth through cloud-based gateways and access points.

Is SSE the same as SASE?

No, SSE is not the same as SASE. Security Service Edge (SSE) focuses solely on security functions, such as CASB, FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA. It's a subset of SASE that concentrates on protecting access to applications and data. Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is a broader framework that combines both security and networking functions. It includes SSE components but additionally incorporates SD-WAN (Software-Defined Wide Area Network) to optimize network connectivity and performance. In essence, SSE is a part of SASE, but SASE offers a more comprehensive approach to securing and optimizing network access.

Despite their tight relationship, networking and security are still two distinct and extremely difficult areas of the IT sector. Rapid security evolution is necessary to safeguard against always-evolving cybersecurity threats, and wide-area networking aims to offer dependable, fast, and adaptable connections. Furthermore, networking and security are usually overseen by separate teams. The cloud-delivered security component of SASE was given its own category, the SSE Magic Quadrant, by Gartner at the beginning of 2022. While SD-WAN specifies the WAN edge networking capability needs of SASE, SSE describes the collection of security services that contribute to the realization of SASE's security vision.

What is the Difference Between SSE and SASE?

SSE is often discussed in conjunction with Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). The reason is that SSE forms a critical component of the broader SASE architecture. SSE focuses exclusively on security capabilities. Meanwhile, SASE covers security and networking functionalities, including Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (SD-WAN). This means that SASE provides a more comprehensive solution. SSE is particularly suited for organizations that prioritize security and require robust protection for remote users without the need for extensive networking capabilities. In contrast, SASE appeals to organizations looking for a unified approach to managing both their networking and security infrastructure. SSE adopts a security-first approach, prioritizing the protection of users and data across various environments. SASE, however, aims to optimize both security and network performance, making it ideal for organizations with complex, distributed environments that rely heavily on cloud services.

SASE is a broader framework that incorporates both security and networking functions. It includes all the components of SSE and adds SD-WAN to optimize network traffic flow. One side of SASE is direct access from branch locations to the internet and Quality of Service (QoS). The other part is networking services, or the WAN Edge section, which comprises SD-WAN providing WAN optimization. On the other hand, SWG, CASB, and ZTNA are all part of the Security Services Edge, or SSE. They provide a single platform for uniform security policy delivery, safeguarding users, data, and application access with a single solution.

SASE is preferable for people who are heavily dependent on Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) or Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS). SSE is best for basic cloud access and web interface security. Because of its adaptability, SSE can be easily integrated into current networks without requiring full SASE implementation. This is a simple way to improve security. Key differences between SASE and SSE are listed below:

  • SASE is a comprehensive framework that covers both networking and security, while SSE concentrates solely on security.

  • SASE covers SD-WAN, Routing, Dynamic Path Selection, WAN Optimization, Saas Acceleration, Network as a Service etc.. However, SSE covers encryption/decryption, Remote Browser Isolation, FwaaS, and other SSE components.

  • SASE includes SD-WAN in addition to the security components found in SSE.

  • SASE prioritizes optimized network connectivity and secure access, while SSE emphasizes advanced threat protection and access control.

  • SASE offers robust security features like CASB, FWaaS, ZTNA, and SD-WAN to protect users, applications, and data across distributed environments.

  • SSE provides strong security capabilities through CASB, FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA. It focuses on securing access to cloud services and applications.

  • SASE combines network optimization with security features. This provides a unified platform for managing and securing remote access.

  • SSE delivers a focused set of security services to protect against threats and ensure secure access to cloud resources.

SASE and SSE Comparison Table

A comparison of SASE and SSE is given in the next table

FeatureSASE(Differences)SSE(Differences)Similarities
FocusNetworking and security combinedPrimarily security
ComponentsIncludes (SD-WAN), ZTNA, SWG, CASB, FWaaSZTNA, SWG, CASB, FWaaSBoth frameworks utilize Zero Trust principles and other components to ensure secure access to applications and data.
Target UsersEnterprises needing comprehensive connectivityOrganizations prioritizing securityBoth are designed to secure remote access for users, particularly in hybrid and cloud environments.
DeploymentCloud-based with integrated networkingCloud-based security services onlyBoth frameworks are essential in addressing the challenges posed by remote work and cloud-based applications.
Primary PurposeComprehensive secure connectivity and accessSecure access to applications and dataBoth SASE and SSE are cloud-based frameworks designed to enhance security and connectivity for modern enterprises.

Table 1. Sase vs SSE

What are SSE Applications?

A fresh phase in network security has been initiated by SSE. It provides a more secure and adaptable interface for communication between users, devices, and cloud services. Personalized security is introduced by SSE, as opposed to the previous method, where a single solution was meant to fit all. Some of the SSE application scenarios are as follows:

  • Shielded cloud and the internet: Give employees safe access to the data they require, whether it be via cloud-hosted or SaaS corporate apps or standard internet access. In addition to shielding these employees from online dangers like ransomware, a consistent policy framework helps safeguard company data that is spread across different cloud, SaaS, and private application platforms.

    Eliminate any regulatory errors and reduce any danger brought on by inaccuracies made by people or mismatched policies in the cloud.

  • Identify and eliminate possible threats: Permit IT to find any illegal activity on the part of users sharing company data through unapproved SaaS applications. This makes it possible for IT to safeguard these applications while enabling users to keep using them in accordance with security best practices. By monitoring both ways of traffic, you can find and remove any malicious content and stop damage to company networks, including the theft of confidential data. Using adaptive access controls that take into account the user's location, device posture, and risk assessment, prevent illegal access to apps.

  • Safeguard remote location users: Giving consumers the freedom to access private apps agent-based and agentless on any device, from any place. Defending remote employees against online dangers, including phishing scams and ransomware.

  • Recognize and safeguard private data: With inline controls, you can automatically find sensitive information and prevent sensitive data from being exposed in real-time. This allows security policies to be enforced on the fly. Even when files are exchanged with other parties, protect sensitive data from exposure.

How can SASE work with SSE?

Moving away from a hub-and-spoke style of network connectivity, SASE is a more suitable coordinating alternative for businesses that require extensive cloud-based connectivity and an application for security policies that covers both end users and entire locations. Without adding entirely unnecessary SD-WAN and SDN network traffic management features, SSE provides remote users with the same security options. Today, the majority of enterprises require the suite of controls that SSE offers: data protection, browser and cloud service security, access control and monitoring, and zero-trust model deployment that can safeguard a remote workforce from hostile activity. Both SASE and SSE are offered by many supplier.; SSE is accessible via a licensing scheme that permits an organization to upgrade to SASE as necessary.

SSE by itself may not always provide businesses with the necessary security protection. In other cases, it will make more sense to use SSE technologies in conjunction with SD-WAN. In general, SASE is not beneficial for businesses that already have SD-WAN implementations in place. Security Service Edge will then be a good addition to SD-WAN networking in such a scenario. It offers the security defense that cloud computing infrastructure needs. Certain businesses are required to safeguard their online interfaces and rely less on cloud security. In some cases, SSE might make sense. SWG provides a trustworthy defense against nefarious online activity. Furthermore, it offers strong controls to regulate user behavior.

If a company's primary activities depend on SaaS or IaaS, SASE is likely to be more advantageous. SASE is an all-encompassing, streamlined security solution designed to support a wide range of cloud applications. Network managers can optimize traffic with the help of SD-WAN integration. The network edge is made more secure by Security Service Edge features. In addition, SSE may serve as a stopover before a complete SASE deployment. It fortifies cloud resources with a layer of security. IT professionals now find it simpler to oversee intricate digital transformation procedures.

What are the Advantages of SASE over SSE?

Some companies continue to depend on a multitude of outdated security solutions. These tools include rights management systems, firewalls, and anti-malware scanners. SSE needs to take on the role of current tools' functions in order to function properly. IT teams must, however, take care to prevent security lapses while making the switch. SSE may result in issues with collaboration software and voice-over-IP. Implementations of Security Service Edge tend to perform badly for certain kinds of traffic. In some situations, networks might require SD-WAN functionality in order to operate properly. Workers in security and networking teams may encounter conflict during some SSE transitions. Security guidelines need to be updated to take into account evolving circumstances. The key advantages of SASE over SSE are outlined below:

  • Comprehensive Approach: SASE adopts a more broad strategy by merging security and networking services into a single, cloud-delivered architecture. Better integration, optimization, and enforcement of policies throughout the network architecture become possible.

  • Network Effectiveness: SASE optimizes network traffic routing and offers features like WAN optimization and quality of service (QoS) by integrating SD-WAN capabilities. This leads to improved network performance, especially for distributed organizations with multiple locations and cloud resources.

  • Unified Management: SASE reduces operational overhead and simplifies management by combining networking and security features into a single platform. Through a single console, IT personnel can control configurations and policies.

  • Future-Proofing: SASE offers an architecture that is more future-proof as businesses support remote and hybrid work practices and embrace cloud technology. Its cloud-native architecture makes it simple to scale and adjust to changing business needs.

  • Cost Savings: SASE can save costs by lowering the need for numerous products and infrastructure investments by combining networking and security into a single cloud service. The pay-as-you-go concept brings flexibility to the table.

  • Consistent Security Enforcement: SASE enables consistent application of security policies across all users, devices, and locations, regardless of where they are accessing resources from.

What are Disadvantages of SASE over SSE?

The key disadvantages of SASE compared to SSE are explained below:

  • Coordination Challenges: SASE integrates network access and security, which often requires collaboration between different teams within an organization. This coordination can be challenging, especially if security and network access teams have historically operated independently, leading to potential conflicts and inefficiencies in implementation and management.

  • Complexity in Vendor Selection: Finding the right vendor for SASE can be complicated. Organizations may have differing opinions on which vendor to choose based on their focus on either networking or security. Additionally, while a single-vendor solution is ideal, many enterprises may end up using multiple vendors, complicating integration and management processes.

  • Fragmented Ecosystem: The SASE ecosystem can appear fragmented and confusing, making the procurement process more difficult. Organizations may struggle to navigate the various components and services available, which can hinder effective implementation.

  • Migration Difficulties: For organizations not already advanced in their cloud journey, transitioning to a SASE architecture may be a significant leap. This transition can involve substantial changes to existing network and security architectures, which may not be feasible for all enterprises.

  • Increased Learning Curve: SASE can be more complex to implement and manage than SSE. This is because SASE includes both security and networking functions, which can make it more difficult to configure and troubleshoot. Adopting SASE may require retooling technology teams and enhancing their skills to manage the new integrated architecture effectively. This learning curve can slow down the adoption process and may require additional training and resources.

  • Potential Trade-offs: While SASE aims to enhance security and usability, there may be trade-offs between the two. For example, simplifying access controls to improve the user experience could inadvertently increase the attack possibility. SASE introduces additional attack surfaces compared to SSE, such as the SD-WAN network. SASE can be more expensive than SSE. This is because SASE requires additional hardware and software components, such as SD-WAN appliances and controllers.

How is SASE Implemented?

Implementing SASE can be a complex process, but a structured approach can ease the implementation. It's a tactical step that needs to be carefully planned and carried out. A general summary of the SASE implementation steps is given below:

  1. Assess Current IT Infrastructure: Evaluate existing network, security, and application infrastructure. Identify gaps, inefficiencies, and potential challenges. Define business objectives for SASE implementation. Clearly articulate your organization's goals for SASE implementation, such as improved performance, enhanced security, or cost reduction.

  2. Define SASE Requirements: Specify the security and networking needs of the organization. Determine the desired level of security, performance, and user experience.

  3. Select a SASE Provider: Research and compare different SASE vendors based on their capabilities, features, and pricing, and customer support. Consider factors such as cloud integration, global reach, and security certifications. Conduct a pilot implementation to assess the provider's capabilities. Finalize the agreement with the chosen SASE provider.

  4. Develop a Deployment Plan: Create a detailed implementation plan outlining the project timeline, milestones, and responsibilities. Determine the phased approach for SASE deployment (e.g., pilot, gradual rollout, big bang). Plan how SASE will integrate with existing systems, such as identity management and security information and event management (SIEM).

  5. Integrate SASE Components: Configure and integrate SASE components (SD-WAN, CASB, FWaaS, ZTNA, etc.) into the existing IT environment.

  6. Test and Validate: Conduct thorough testing to ensure SASE is functioning as expected. Verify network performance, application accessibility, and security effectiveness. Identify and address any issues or performance bottlenecks.

  7. Deploy and Migrate: Gradually migrate users and applications to the SASE platform. Monitor performance and address any challenges during the migration process, make necessary adjustments. Provide end-user training and support.

Is SASE an Emerging technology?

Yes, SASE is considered an emerging technology. Its components have already been around for some time. But SASE represents a visible movement in how companies manage their network security. The increasing use of cloud computing and remote work in recent years has made this more important. The idea was first presented by Gartner, and because of its capacity to handle contemporary security issues related to dispersed workforces and cloud environments, it is quickly gaining support among businesses. stating that although the idea of combining security and network operations into a single cloud-based platform is still relatively new, SASE's individual components, such as SD-WAN, CASB, FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA, have been in existence for a while. It would be more accurate to refer to SASE as a mature concept with increasing acceptance or as a converged architecture. It brings together existing technologies to address the evolving needs of modern businesses operating in a cloud-centric, remote work environment.

While the full realization of SASE capabilities is still evolving, the underlying concept and its building blocks are well-established in the IT industry. The key factors in SASE being an emerging technology include:

  • Rapid Adoption Trends: According to projections, by 2024, over 40% of enterprises are expected to have explicit strategies for SASE adoption. This was predicted as 1% around 2018. The trend tells us that SASE is a critical framework for securing modern network architectures. Remote work became permanent, and cloud-based applications proliferated.

  • Integration of Services: SASE combines firewalls, secure web gateways, and zero-trust network access into a solution that can be managed from a centralized console. This simplifies security management and improves visibility across hybrid environments.

  • Adaptability to Modern Needs: The technology is designed to meet the demands of a mobile workforce and the increasing complexity of network environments. As organizations adopt multi-cloud strategies and edge computing, SASE provides a flexible and scalable solution that can secure data and apps.

  • Future Growth Potential: The SASE market is expected to grow significantly. By 2025, at least 60% of enterprises will have strategies for SASE adoption. This growth is driven by the need for more robust security measures in response to evolving cyber threats and the increasing reliance on cloud services.